A dear friend introduced me to Sons of Korah some years back. On the most dangerous of my military deployments, I listened almost daily to this particular song. If you are joining me in this weekend of prayer for our nation, please meditate on the scripture contained here. “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” Ultimately, the enemy of peace, truth and justice in this land is not a political party. It is the Prince of this world, who desires the destruction of all of us. May God confound his plans, and continue to show mercy.
The next couple of days may prove to be “the deep breath before the plunge.” Not to be melodramatic, but as Gandalf told Pippin, “the board is set, the pieces are moving.” I believe the weeks ahead, between now and the 2020 election, are some of the most critical our country has faced. As many of our past leaders have noted, our greatest dangers come not from external enemies, but rather from within.
So how is the board set, and what pieces are in play? First, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in a public statement today, finally publicly directed her party’s committee chairs to begin drafting formal articles of impeachment against President Trump, despite the fact any fair observer of the “inquiry” thus far would note it has hurt, rather than helped, their case.
House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler announced the committee will hold hearings toward that end, beginning Monday morning. But that’s not the only piece moving on Monday. That same day, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is scheduled to finally release the report on his investigation into possibly serious improprieties by the previous administration to justify spying on the Trump campaign in 2016. These are suspected to include, according to many sources, FBI personnel tampering with interview documentation and concealing potentially exculpatory evidence from their requests to the FISA Court for warrants on various Trump allies. The IG’s semiannual report to Congress at the end of September noted it had 48 open cases regarding official misconduct by Department of Justice employees. It’s not unreasonable to think that might be related. The new report due Monday is rumored to be around 1,000 pages. As some commentators have noted, it doesn’t take 1,000 pages to say there was no wrongdoing. But if one is making a detailed case… or in fact has already referred charges to U.S. Attorney John Durham for prosecution, such a lengthy report would be expected.
The release of the report will be followed by an appearance by IG Horowitz before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, two days after the report’s release. These two dates — December 9th and 11th — have been public for a while. So it’s likely not a coincidence Speaker Pelosi told her House to get moving with impeachment today. The Democrats’ own day of reckoning may be imminent, and it’s been clear this week they’ve been counter-programming the public narrative against any potential negative revelations.
What I can’t understand is why the Democrats would formally impeach the president, forcing a trial before the GOP-controlled Senate. The Democrats have been patently unethical in their conduct of the “inquiry” to date, refusing to allow the GOP to call their own witnesses (with one exception), limiting GOP members’ access to interviews and documentation, and generally riding roughshod over any notions of fairness to the accused. This, of course, is now standard procedure for the Left (see: Brett Kavanaugh). Pelosi’s partisans deliberately have presented a warped, one-sided perspective of the issues at hand (much as they’re alleged to have done with the FISA Court), and their allies in the press have been their megaphone. Representative Nadler’s opening assertion that “the facts are not in dispute” is about as true as “the science is settled” when it comes to
global warming climate change climate crisis.
The Senate, as the Founders intended, tends to be more sober and dignified about such things, so there’s not likely to be a “payback is a b–ch” approach to their own proceedings when the ball lands in their court. But I strongly suspect there’ll be a concerted effort to make sure America gets, in the words of the late Paul Harvey, “the rest of the story.” That possibility alone should make the Democrats think twice about handing off the baton to the Senate. There’s already enough evidence that’s been made public that puts the lie to the narrative they’re selling. But as Glenn Reynolds has said repeatedly about the odds of a Trump reelection, “all the Democrats have to do is not act crazy… and they can’t even do that.” So here’s hoping they try to hand the Senate a lit stick of dynamite, only to have it blow up in their own face, like Wile E. Coyote.
While I could be wrong, I only see two possible outcomes at this point. One is that the president is removed from office. Such a result will, I believe, only convince many (including me) who love this country that it no longer represents them and will not tolerate them interfering with the agenda of their self-declared betters. The Democrats underestimated the anger that helped propel Trump into office. I don’t think they have any notion of the anger that would result from his removal, either.
The second outcome is for the administration to successfully pull the covers off the Deep State shenanigans that began even before Trump took office, and to do so in a way the public and press cannot ignore. There is every reason to believe that if a full public accounting took place, the outcry for justice would be deafening.
Either way, the result will occur in a nation that is armed to the teeth. I generally see that as a good thing. But given the chasm that has opened among us, it’s also a sobering thing to remember. Sure, the “side” I identify with likes to joke that we have most of the guns since the Left finds them icky. I enjoy ribbing the other side as much as the next guy. But as a historian I also know in 1860 both the Union and Confederates held each other in martial as well as social contempt, convinced the war would be quick and easy over their “deranged” opponents. How’d that work out for them? Most wars start with such ill-considered bravado.
The day may come when ballots fail and bullets are required, if we are to remain free. Americans have faced such situations before, and must be prepared to face such again. But let no one kid themselves about what that may mean for all we hold dear.
So I ask that this weekend be one of prayer — a deep breath before the plunge of next week. Prayer for the truth to be fully revealed, no matter where it leads. Prayer that our country will once again value truth over shading information for partisan or personal advantage. Prayer for our leaders — on both sides of the aisle — that they will be honest with us, sober, and careful with the governance of our nation. Prayer that our disputes will be resolved peacefully, rather than in the streets (*). Prayer that for each of us, God may guide our words and our actions, balancing the requirements of justice and mercy, passion and restraint. And most importantly, prayer that the Spirit may bring revival in this land, restoring the fellowship and discipleship of repentant believers that was so vital to its founding. For everything, we are told, there is a season. May God show us what this season is, and what is required of us in response.
God bless you, and God bless America.
(*) I believe many in our nation fail to realize how the peaceful resolution of the disputed election in 2000 was a historical anomaly for the world, and a testament to the strength of our society. We should never take such for granted.
As is tradition on this blog, we begin the Advent season with a version of one of my favorite Christmas hymns:
I’m really tired of reading stories like this:
Jose Bryan Guzman, an 18-year-old illegal alien from El Salvador, is accused of murdering 19-year-old Marlene Yamileth Portillo-Posada — who he was apparently dating at the time — on August 24 by strangling her to death because Guzman believed Portillo-Posada was cheating on him…
In December 2018, Guzman was arrested by the Durham Police Department after allegedly robbing two victims at gunpoint in separate incidents. The same month as the armed robberies, Durham County Sheriff Clarence Birkhead announced that he was ending all cooperation with ICE, turning the region into a sanctuary jurisdiction.
Subsequently, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency requested that the sanctuary county of Durham County hold Guzman until he could be properly turned over to agents. Instead, Durham County officials ignored ICE’s request and released him into the general public in March — six months before he allegedly murdered his girlfriend…
In Fiscal Year 2019, North Carolina sanctuary jurisdictions freed about 563 illegal aliens from custody instead of turning them over to ICE agents. Of those illegal aliens released, more than 500 have been convicted of crimes, including 28 convicted of assault, 192 convicted on traffic violations, 84 convicted of drunk driving, 46 convicted of possession of drugs, and 35 convicted of larceny.
State and local officials who want to play the “sanctuary game” are showing utter contempt for the rule of law and the safety of those they are supposed to serve. I don’t see any reason not to charge them as accessories to these sorts of crimes, since by ignoring the ICE holding request they facilitated the commission of the crimes. In addition, any jurisdiction that refuses to cooperate with ICE should lose all Federal funding of any kind. Even the uber-Left 9th Circuit had to admit the administration has such discretion, though in practice this penalty is far from being tightly applied.
The only way to deter these local virtue-signaling scofflaws is to put their skin in the game. It’s long past time we do just that.
Former U.S. House Speaker “Tip” O’Neal is most commonly associated with asserting that “all politics is local.” As we’ve moved away from Federalism and republicanism toward democratic homogenization in this country, I think that’s become less and less true:
Coloradans are drawing a line in the asphalt when it comes to California’s growing influence on their SUVs, trucks and votes.
The Colorado-based Freedom to Drive Coalition filed a lawsuit this month against the state’s adoption of California’s zero-emissions vehicle standards, arguing that the rules violate state law and would add thousands of dollars to the cost of the heavy-duty vehicles favored by drivers navigating Colorado’s snowy roads.
Meanwhile, supporters of the Electoral College are balking at the lopsided flood of cash pouring in from California to prevent Colorado voters from overturning the National Popular Vote bill, which Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat, signed into law in March.
Figures compiled by Protect Colorado’s Vote show that more than 98% of the donations to Yes on National Popular Vote have been from Californians, while Coloradans have contributed 99% of the revenue raised to exit the compact.
“Obviously, California is incredibly engaged in getting Colorado’s votes,” said Mesa County Commissioner Rose Pugliese, who heads the referendum campaign.
This situation exemplifies why the Electoral College was put into place. Without it, just 9 States (California, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Georgia and Florida) could elect the president, since they account for just over half the U.S. population. Other States would become mere subsidiaries of one of these population centers. Those who want the popular vote to prevail in presidential elections know they face an uphill battle to amend the Constitution. Thus the “National Popular Vote” bill effort in many states, trying to put together a coalition to lump together a bunch of States to do what I believe to be an unconstitutional end-run around the Electoral College.
As the article above shows, what may work for California (and that’s arguable) may not apply to the conditions of another State, like Colorado. This is one of many reasons the Founders intended most governance to be local (State and below), with the Federal government largely charged with handling the external affairs of the federation of States. Too much of the divisiveness in this country is driven by efforts to impose “one size allegedly fits all” solutions from Washington, D.C. (or Sacramento, in this case). What’s tragically ironic is that the loudest proponents of unitary government suddenly find their inner secessionist whenever the Federal Government goes against their agenda. States like New York are passing local bills enshrining the legality of abortion, since many expect Roe v. Wade to be reviewed, revised or overturned in the next few years by a Supreme Court with more constitutional originalists on its bench. The Left will stick up for “States’ rights” in such a scenario, but more times than not, they are happy to use Federal power to bludgeon the entire nation into compliance with their agenda.
Campaign financing has been another insidious erosion of local politics. Note in the linked article who is funding the two sides of the National Popular Vote campaign. Why are Californians allowed to contribute to campaigns in Colorado? Another example is Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes. Once she won her primary in 2018, out-of-state money provided the majority of her general election campaign financing. How does this square with the idea a ‘representative’ reflects local opinion and priorities? (Spoiler: it doesn’t.)
What this does is turn every Congressional/Senatorial race into a national campaign. We hear about the outsize influence of billionaires. Well, guess who has the wherewithal to fund candidates all across the country? That’s not the vision the Founders had in mind. Want to reign in the influence of campaign contributions? Two steps: only allow individual citizens (not corporations, PACs or any other organizational source) to contribute, and require them to contribute only to their State/local races. As is often pointed out, only the office of the presidency was designed to be elected by the entire nation. The current campaign financing model undermines that.
A truly federal system allows for variations and experimentation of policy to best meet local conditions and aspirations. We have moved away from that to our great detriment. How about some of that magic “diversity” when it comes to letting locals set their own agenda? Save the Federal power for things that truly matter to everyone — like upholding the “Life” part of “Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness” by protecting the unborn.