No more excuses

Less than a year and a half ago, the entire Republican membership of Congress voted to send a bill to President Obama that would have repealed Obamacare.

But that was just for consumption by the rubes back in their home districts.  Clearly, the president wasn’t about to agree to dismantling his namesake health care takeover plan.

That the Republican party isn’t truly serious about seeking smaller government should be apparent to everyone.  They control both houses of Congress, and work with a President who committed himself to getting rid of the misnamed “Affordable Care Act.”

So why won’t they send the same bill to the new occupant of the Oval Office?

Because they know he’d sign it.  Then they’re not just posturing for the constituents, they’re actually removing an ill-conceived government program riddled equally with incompetence and opportunities for political theft and graft.

This is why I stopped identifying as “Republican” close to a dozen years ago.

It’s time to call their bluff.  Everyone who believes the Supreme Court was insane to rule this health care law constitutional, everyone who wants to see health care costs fall instead of rise, everyone who believes the free market, not the bureaucrats best meets our individual needs, simply MUST contact their representatives and demand they resubmit the previous bill.

No more stalling while “a draft” is written.  There’s no need to reinvent the wheel.

Paul Ryan – your membership in the Deep State is showing.  You best realize the election of Trump was a symptom of patience becoming exhausted.

Congress is acting in direct opposition to the mandate expressed in November’s election. So here’s the deal, Congress:

Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way.

What can Brown do for to you?

The Ivy League brand is the only reason anyone would pay $65,000 a year to experience this nonsense.  But with any luck, the past year or so of public attention to what is really going on at these campuses will irrevocably destroy that brand — and good riddance!

“There are people breaking down, dropping out of classes and failing classes because of the activism work they are taking on,” said David, an undergraduate whose name has been changed to preserve anonymity. Throughout the year, he has worked to confront issues of racism and diversity on campus.

His role as a student activist has taken a toll on his mental, physical and emotional health. “My grades dropped dramatically. My health completely changed. I lost weight. I’m on antidepressants and anti-anxiety pills right now. (Counseling and Psychological Services) counselors called me. I had deans calling me to make sure I was okay,” he said…

Justice Gaines ’16, who uses the pronouns xe, xem and xyr, said student activism efforts on campus are necessary. “I don’t feel okay with seeing students go through hardships without helping and organizing to make things better.”

In the wake of The Herald’s opinion pieces, Gaines felt overwhelmed by emotions flooding across campus. Students were called out of class into organizing meetings, and xe felt pressure to help xyr peers cope with what was going on, xe said. Gaines “had a panic attack and couldn’t go to class for several days.”

And these are the well-connected supposed leaders of tomorrow?  Consider the irony of ‘students’ (can we call them that if studying isn’t the top priority?) who rally to decry “privilege,” while constantly seeking Dean’s notes that extend their academic suspenses so they can be disruptive crybullies (a recently coined term I find to be spot on) at campus speaking events featuring opinions with which they disagree.  What, exactly, are they paying exorbitant tuition for — the latitude to make public nuisances of themselves?

This surrealistic nonsense has gone on long enough.  It’s time to stop pretending these institutions produce anything but confused and quite possibly mentally damaged permanent adolescents who are incapable of dealing with reality.  These ‘future leaders’ are steeped in the warped worldviews of the self-professed ‘social justice warriors’ who now infest everything from Twitter and other tech industries to entertainment outlets and educational institutions, and who use their influence to enforce a velvet-glove version of fascist thought control.  It’s long past time to return the favor and begin the process of ostracizing anyone who supports this insanity.  Aside from social networking and trying to signal some sort of liberal virtue, what possible value could be had by hiring someone whose ‘education’ consists of the Red Guard indoctrination described in Brown University’s own newspaper?  Any business owner with a smidgeon of sense would be well advised to simply drop in the wastebasket any application from an Ivy League graduate, and to make it known they place no value on a diploma from these cesspools.  No high-performing company or organization has time for such drama queens and distractions.

And considering their behavior in recent years, it’s not as though any of “xem” have a leg to stand on to claim viewpoint discrimination.  If they want to break the truce of civility, so be it – let xem reap what they’ve sown.  Those of us who live in the real world don’t need xem… they need us, just as a parasite needs a host.

The hosts, as our current politics show, are getting a little tired of the non-productive bloodsuckers…

Every Kid gets a trophy

Quote of the day

“To most people espousing communism, the authoritarianism isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. All the talk about “sharing” and “compassion” is just to fool the rubes. People espousing communism should be treated as if they are on the same moral plane as people espousing Nazism, because they are.”  — Glenn Reynolds

 

One of the greatest propaganda successes of the 20th Century was to convince people that communism and fascism were opposite ends of the political spectrum, when in fact they both represent collectivist systems in which a small minority direct in excruciating detail the everyday affairs of the average person.  Kind of like Uncle Sam aspires to today.  The real polar opposite of such regimes is individualism and personal sovereignty.  In the extreme this is anarchy, which is hardly desirable either.  But the desire for a just and orderly society does not automatically translate into justification for a heavily regimented and autocratic one.  And nothing shows one’s ignorance of history so much as calling a champion of small government and personal freedom a “fascist.”

California Dreamin’

Hope springs eternal in the Left Coast media regarding the ‘change’ Obama has wrought… but does so on the back of tropes and stereotypes, rather than facts:

Since Obama took office, corporate profits are way up. So is business investment, job growth (moderately), retail sales, manufacturing (well, barely). Want to buy another house? Interest rates are fantastic. The housing crisis has largely subsided, and home foreclosures are way down. Also, people are buying lots of new cars, and there’s a fully recovered auto industry ready to meet all demand.  ((And yet even this editorial seems to admit what good news exists is largely for the well-connected and the oft-decried “one percenters,” rather than a broad-based benefit to Americans.  That’s because the wealthy and powerful–on the so-called left and right–have bent government to their service as a gatekeeper. — Jemison))

…federal discretionary spending is well below average… ((it’s declined only as a percentage of the budget as mandatory–entitlement–spending has increased; overall the government is still spending ridiculous amounts and running ruinous deficits… something every president since Reagan has been guilty of — Jemison))

…the poverty rate has stabilized ((Umm… — Jemison))

…I’ve yet to see a solid batch of evidence that proves Obama’s outright failure, or the nation’s savage decline. I see a blip about food stamps, I see a few weak economic signs here and there, but mostly, since 2009, it all’s been somewhere between timidly and shockingly positive…

To hear Mr. Newport Beach tell it, my president is a downright monster. Who cares if he ended the war, saved the economy, restored America’s stature in the world, nailed Osama bin Laden, invested billions in clean energy ((where does the Constitution give Uncle Sam the power to invest in companies with my tax money?  — Jemison)), partially reformed what is still the most expensive, least effective health care system in the industrialized world…

And as for the myth that the rich are all anti-Democrat, well… to paraphrase Orwell, “All progressive leftists are equal, but some are more equal than others…”

Obama has not single-handedly destroyed America.  The nation’s undoing has been a bipartisan project, decades in the making.  Obama’s policies have put the pedal closer to the metal in terms of the pace of ‘change,’ and it is his misfortune to be on watch as it becomes increasingly difficult to paper over the structural rot that Uncle Sam’s bureausclerotic micromanagement of society has produced.

That doesn’t mean Obama’s fellow travelers in the corporate media won’t continue trying to enable him, cribbing from the great and powerful Oz: “pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.”

King-sized ego

The President’s critics (including me) frequently accuse him of acting more like a monarch than an executive charged with ‘faithfully executing the laws.’

So naturally, the ‘most transparent administration ever’ (sic) decides to have a little fun with the official White House Twitter account:

screen_shot_2014-05-07_at_10_55_45_pm_uxxkde

It’s one thing when the president’s acolytes openly wish he could rule by fiat.  It’s quite another when such fantasies are conveyed by official statements and gestures.  And considering the nihilistic, God-less nature of the whole ‘Game of Thrones’ world, what does it say that POTUS is role-playing ‘top of the heap’ with that motif?

Yes, I realize they’ll say it was a light-hearted jest.  It’s more of a taunt, particularly given all the scandals bulging under the rugs.  And it’s not funny.

Not even close.

 

Historically illiterate

In a sane world, this would result in one losing one’s teaching job:

6a00d83451675669e201a3fd03194d970b-800wi

Let’s break this down, shall we?

– “NAZI” is an acronym for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.  Hmm.

– Their “25-point program” wasn’t exactly friendly to capitalist processes.  Hmm.

– “The Road to Serfdom” was written in defense of the free market and freedom, and against the idea of centrally planned economies such as both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

That latter point is the most important.  Somehow, in the years since World War II, people have been brainwashed to see Nazism and Communism as opposite ends of the “left-right” spectrum.  They are not.  They both fall on the command economy side of the spectrum.  Hitler and Stalin battled over which band of thugs would rule and under what banner, *not* over some radically different idea of how human society should be ordered.  Both the Nazi and Soviet regimes were centralized, genocidal evils.

So when leftists today accuse their political opponents of being  “Nazis,” understand they are simply historically illiterate.  Not to mention idiots.  The true “right” side of the political spectrum doesn’t reside under a swastika.  Rather, those who live there are suspicious of any national emblems and “calls to the colors,” because what they really want is the radical agenda of leaving others the hell alone.  They are the minarchists, which is as far from overbearing centralized authority as you can get.

Now, can we please dispense with ‘teachers’ who are still parroting Uncle Joe Stalin’s equation of Nazism with capitalism, half a century after everyone should know better?   (End rant)

Do YOU know what’s being taught in YOUR kids’ schools?

A tale of two Black Fridays

It seems now every year the media is prepositioned to highlight the tales of brawling, snarling consumers trampling one another for ‘doorbreaker’ deals on Black Friday.  And every year it seems the hype leading up the weekend is amped just a little bit more.

Interestingly, a Facebook friend of mine (who is not a Christian), had this to say this morning:

I think (Black Friday) appeals to people as it satisfies four deadly sins in one outing. Lust (nonsexual unless you’re into rubbing up against many people); greed, because people usually already have one of those plastic items they will kill their neighbor for or they buy three of the same item; pride, so they can show off that they scored the latest piece of crap that everyone wants; and envy, because they might not be shooting it out with their neighbor if they did not think someone else on the block had something cooler than what they have in their box dwelling. (Disclaimer: Oxford semi-colons included at no extra cost and Wiki was used for a research tool on the Seven Deadly Sins)

I had to reply that I believe he’s spot on – this manufactured High Holy Day of Commercialism is the antithesis of everything the teachings of Christ and the Word of God convey.   It emphasizes the material over the personal, things over people, and self at the expense of or in competition with others.   It is the worst of mankind’s fallen nature, played like a fiddle by the one who knows how to get man to dance to his tune.  The lack of self-control or concern for others exhibited on this day may be the purest distillation of the lack of discipline and empathy that is the root cause of our civilization’s decay.

One Black FridayThere was another thought I encountered online, however, that complemented my friend’s thoughts, though he doesn’t yet profess faith in its truth (see image):

The insatiable human appetite for anything is driven by a craving that resulted from separation from the One thing that satisfies.  Perhaps our world would be far better off   if the day of Thanks to God were followed by a day (…or 364 or so…) dedicated to Seeking God, rather than the shopping gods.