I don’t know how I didn’t discover this artist sooner, but I’m glad I finally did. I’ve been enjoying a number of songs by him. This one was inspired by Johnny Cash’s life.
One thing about the Trump era: it’s caused a lot of people to confront the misplaced notion that Christians are supposed to be all about inoffensive sweetness and niceness, and only support politicians of that variety:
There are innumerable examples of people who are wonderful but unaccomplished just as there are many notable examples of people with serious personal failings who nonetheless have excelled in other parts of their lives: artists, scientists, parents, and even politicians.
And yes, I’m not so subtly making a point about President Trump. His private failings have been made very public prompting some Christian pundits to say that not only do those failings disqualify Trump from office, but they are so egregious as to make supporting him sinful for Christians.
It should be obvious that support for a political candidate does not mean a blanket endorsement of every aspect that candidate’s life. It is merely an endorsement of that person’s policies and an assessment of his ability to perform in office. What’s more, it’s often not even a blanket endorsement of that, it’s a practical decision that Candidate A, while imperfect, is preferable to Candidate B…
The question is, by what standard should a Christian judge a candidate or an officeholder? Part of the answer is that the Christian and non-Christian ought to judge in the same way: what can the candidate do to protect the peace and prosperity of the nation and its citizens? Christians would add that they require political leaders that will protect the right of the Church to worship freely and its members to practice their faith in peace.
If personal sin were disqualifying, who could lead? Christians in particular, for whom recognition of indwelling sin is both a predicate and a sustainer of faith, should know this. I suspect what the Frenches really want is a prophet, a priest, and a king to rule in this secular age, a political leader in which they can invest their highest hopes. But in doing so, they are placing upon liberal politics a weight it cannot hope to carry and are headed for disappointment. The good news is, if they want a prophet, a priest, and a king, they already have one . . . in Christ.
As a presidential candidate in 2012, [Mitt Romney] was weak and ineffectual, letting Barack Obama walk all over him and run away with the race. But vote for him because he’s polite and he doesn’t curse! Voters, many of them Christians, decided that the time for beautiful losers is over.
Exactly. As I watch my country overrun by uninvited invaders, beset by hostile ideologies growing within and enemies gathering without, I am really not concerned with parlor games and political pleasantries anymore. It’s no exaggeration to say our birthright freedoms are in a fight for their very survival. In such a situation I’ll take a committed patriot with the manners of Genghis Khan over a manicured globalist who’s a disciple of Ann Landers; a Patton, not a Pope.
And as for Christianity requiring a milquetoast demeanor… our adversaries would have us forget that Our Lord’s example includes such pleasantries as flipping tables, driving people with whips, calling deceivers ‘vipers‘ and children of Satan, and calling down woe on feckless leaders more interested in themselves than in those they were called to lead. Christ isn’t just the Lamb… He’s also the Lion of Judah. “Not a tame lion,” either, as C.S. Lewis once pointed out.
So despite his many past moral failings, maybe… just maybe… Trump’s on to something here. I’ll certainly never confuse him with Christ. But Twitter aside, regarding the manner in which he is governing I’ll say he is more Christ-like than many of the false-faced Wormtongues who surround him in Mordor. It’s amusing: the Left always screeches that Christian faith should never influence public policy. But faced with Trump, who has committed the unpardonable sin of actually trying to govern as he campaigned, the Left — which recognizes no restraints of civility on its own quest for power — is more than willing to use a watered-down, denatured vision of the Christian walk to try to shame people out of supporting him.
I mean it literally when I say “to hell with that.”
Can you spot the difference?
I don’t know anyone who worships Easter. Do you? Apparently a lot of Democrats do:
Former President Barack Obama, former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and several other leading Democrats denounced terror attacks on what they called “Easter worshippers” — not Christians — Sunday in Sri Lanka.
Suicide bombers murdered nearly 300 people and wounded 500 more in attacks on three churches, three hotels, and a housing complex. Many were killed as they attended Mass for Easter Sunday. The government reportedly suspects that the bombers, all Sri Lankans, were members of “a domestic Islamist terror group named National Thowfeek Jamaath.”
Yet Obama, Clinton, and other Democrats — including 2020 presidential contender Julián Castro — could not bring themselves to identify the victims of the attacks as “Christians,” calling them “Easter worshippers” instead in eerily similar responses.
Of course they’re similar. Satan is called “the Father of Lies,” so it stands to reason he’s pretty good at message discipline in his deception. In his playbook, Christians can only be mentioned if they’re tarred with nefarious accusations, deserved or not. Can’t have people sympathizing with them — that’s reserved for minorities and the “Religion of Pieces.”
At the same time, anyone who recognizes the prevalence of jihad and Christian persecution is just some angry right-wing extremist:
As Glenn Reynolds points out:
They don’t want you to be angry, even though they know you have things to be angry about. They want you to be ashamed, all the time, for disagreeing with them about, well, anything. Meanwhile they want to keep their own base angry and inflamed 24/7. News spin revolves around this to a huge degree.
I refuse to be ashamed for disagreeing with people who can’t seem to figure out there are only two genders. As for anger… Christians are never told in scripture not to be angry — only to be careful that in our anger, we do not sin. Given how much we’ve had to become angry about since 9/11, that’s increasingly difficult. At least for me. I take some solace in this, though: if this prayer was good enough for David, it’s good enough for me:
The righteous will be glad when they see sinners punished;
they will wade through the blood of the wicked.
People will say, “The righteous are indeed rewarded;
there is indeed a God who judges the world.”
Those who refuse to say Christ’s name today will one day bow at the sound of it. May that day come soon, both here and abroad. My waders are ready and waiting.
When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne. They cried out with a loud voice, “O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before you will judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brothers should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been.
…is the most significant symbol of the Christian faith. The cross is where Christ took our place, judged and condemned for our sins. The pivotal moment, that. But the empty tomb proved he wasn’t just a madman on a fool’s errand with delusions of grandeur. Christ claimed to be the Son of God, equal to the Father. Thus, as C.S. Lewis famously wrote, there are only three ways to respond to Him: call Him a liar, call Him a lunatic, or call Him Lord. Eternity hinges on which one you choose.
And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.
If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied.
But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.
He is risen! He is risen indeed!
Anticipating the possibility the monstrous Roe v. Wade decision might be overturned eventually, New York State passed landmark legislation to ensure the practice of sacrificing children to convenience will continue… and that the value of unborn life will continue to fall:
New York, with a newly empowered Democratic legislature, legalized late-term abortion on Tuesday and removed criminal penalties for botched abortions or other violence that leads to an in utero baby’s death. The sweeping law would remove the state’s ability to prosecute a Kermit Gosnell–type offender or a person who kills a child in utero through domestic abuse, for example.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, was not bashful about putting his signature to the new abortion law, wearing a pink tie, cracking jokes about how many years it took to pass the law, and ordering the World Trade Center to be lit in pink in celebration.
And the governor made sure to sign the bill on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, to make a statement. Most concerning is the fact this legislation permits abortion after 24 weeks of pregnancy, provided the mother’s life or health is at risk. The act does not define health risk, however, leading some to believe this could be a loophole to allow near or full-term abortions under the guise of “emotional health risk” or other such interpretations. The new law also moves regulation of abortion from the criminal law code to the public health code, lessening the impact of any sanctions.
Some news coverage of the event noted New York’s abortion rate is already twice the national average, with 23 abortions per 1,000 women of childbearing age. That statistic conceals the true impact, however. New York States own reported statistics show that for the period 2012 to 2014, there were 712,497 births in the state. Over the same three-year period, there were 285,127 abortions.
This means just over 1 in 4 pregnancies in New York end in abortion. 1 in 4!
New York City is a center of world banking and commerce, with fantastic amounts of money flowing through it. Fortunes are made and lost every day. Could it be New Yorkers are literally sacrificing their futures for the fleeting prosperity of the moment? If so, they would hardly be the first. Governor Cuomo celebrated the new law by ordering the new Freedom Tower (the replacement for the Twin Towers toppled on 9/11) to be lit in pink. That prompted someone to update this old image with the same color.
We have descended from the piousness of the Pilgrims to the practices of the pagan Ammonites. They, too, sacrificed children in the hope of material prosperity.
Today, the Ammonite civilization, such as it was, is dead. When we’re extending a big pink middle finger towards the heavens, should we expect any different?
Pray for our nation!
Pardon the long post as I parse the issue du jour. Given the wide reach of Outrage, Inc., you may have heard how a group of MAGA-hat-wearing Catholic high school boys surrounded and intimidated a Native American elder in Washington D.C. Saturday, treating him with utter disrespect.
What you probably didn’t hear was:
- The young men were waiting for their charter bus as instructed by their teachers, and passing the time laughing and socializing as high-spirited young men do.
- They were harassed and insulted for about half an hour by a small group of radical “Black Hebrews,” who accused whites (and Donald Trump) of being pro-homosexual, and who called a black teen in the group “nigger” and urged him to abandon his white friends.
- The Native American elder, Nathan Phillips, who appears to be a professional grievancemonger, walked into the group of kids and began beating his drum inches from the face of one of them.
How do I know these things? Because I sought out and viewed longer film clips than the carefully selected 90-second vignettes and still photos curated by the liberal legacy press, including a nearly 2-hour one filmed by the “Black Hebrews” themselves:
Timestamps (please note: the “Hebrew” cameraman is very liberal with his profanity):
Beginning: notice the “Hebrews” are first yelling at the Native Americans, telling them they “lost their land” because they “worshipped creation rather than the Creator.” One can only imagine the coverage had this been a group of white Christians saying that to the Native protestors. They go on to claim that “native Americans, Hispanics and blacks” are the “real” children of Israel, and the Jews of today are “imposters.” (44:00) This is the thrust of the first 45 minutes of the video.
At 44:30, the cameraman notices a few students standing by with “MAGA” sweaters and hats. “These are the people who are going to f*** your country up, Mr. White Man” the cameraman says.
At 46:18 the speaker refers to a nearby priest (who was probably part of the March for Life) as a “faggot” and “Father Hands.” By this point more students are showing up (remember: they’d been told to gather at the Jefferson Memorial to be picked up by their bus). The speaker refers to all of them (Catholics) as “child-molesting faggots” like “your president, Donald Trump.”
At 49:00, while arguing with a black man who’s calling them out for their hateful speech, the cameraman asks why he wants to fight with his “brothers” with “all these dirty-a** crackers behind you, with their red Make America Great Again hats on… racist b*stards…”
This is what these kids unknowingly went into, following their instructions on where to assemble at the end of the March for Life and visiting D.C. I’m reasonably sure they had never encountered anything quite like it back in Kentucky.
The speaker begins to address the kids directly (50:00), saying it’s only whites “who shoot up schools.” When the kids turn away from him, he begins to ridicule them. At 53:00 he notes some of the kids had come back, after taking their hats off. (Remember – they were where they’d been told to go… could it be they were trying to diffuse the situation?) At 59:00, seeing more and more kids show up, “look at all these demons… vicious crowd.”
By 1:07:00, the speaker is focused solely on the kids, calling them “incest babies” and such. The kids (all but one on a skateboard — not clear if he’s part of the school group) keep their distance. They begin chanting school spirit cheers, to drown out and mock the abuse being hurled their way.
Only at the one hour, 12-minute mark do we finally first see Nathan Phillips, the “Native Elder.” He and a group with cameras behind him, walks up to the group of kids. He moves to them… not the other way around. Note: the kids were already chanting school spirit chants in response to the insults of the Black Hebrews. They did NOT start in response to Phillips and his drum. As one kid later wrote to a local TV station, from their perspective, it was like Phillips wanted to join in with them or something.
Over the next couple minutes, Phillips continues to work his way into the group of teens. This is how he became “surrounded.” He is the instigator of confrontation, not the teens. He stops in front of one bewildered young man and continues to beat on his drum. Frankly the kid shows admirable restraint at this invasion of his personal space. He also seems to be quite aware of the number of cameras being shoved in his face. What would most adults do in such a situation?
At 1:17:00, as the groups have converged, an adult’s voice can be heard telling the kids “back it up.” The kids move back from the “Hebrews.” Just before 1:19:00, the Hebrews start insulting a black student for associating with the rest of the group.
Sadly, the school has already issued a condemnation of the kids based on initial reporting. (Feel free to let them know they made a mistake.) Meanwhile various reporters are looking to identify the teens, with one even asking on Twitter that people with copies of the school’s yearbook contact her! This is completely unacceptable.
The school’s objective was to have their kids participate in the March for Life protest against the continuing scourge of abortion. But it’s safe to say these kids learned some unintentional, yet valuable lessons about the condition of their country and the mendacity of the press. It remains to be seen, however, how much they’ll pay for those lessons at the hands of people who hate them simply because of who they are. And yet the kids are supposed to be the racists?
Scientists are still seeking an explanation for a significant gap in the geological record:
When the famed explorer John Wesley Powell bumped, splashed and thrashed his way down the Colorado River in 1869, he discovered one of the most striking geologic features on Earth. Not the Grand Canyon — although that too is a marvel — but a conspicuous boundary between the sunset-colored sediments of the upper walls and the dark, jagged rocks below them.
Powell had learned to read the layers of desert rocks like pages in a book, and he recognized that the boundary represented a missing chapter in Earth’s geological history. Later, researchers realized it was more like an entire lost volume, spanning roughly one-fifth of Earth’s existence, and that a similar gap existed in many places around the world.
“There must have been some sort of special event in Earth’s history that led to widespread erosion,” said Steve Marshak, a geologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who studies what has come to be known as the Great Unconformity. (emphasis added)…
Since there are so few rocks from that period, the researchers had to look for other kinds of clues to figure out what happened. They reasoned that the missing layers probably went through the full geologic spin cycle: They would have been broken down into sediment and washed out to sea, then deposited on the ocean floor and recycled into the mantle during subduction before finally melting into the magma that feeds volcanoes.
Keller’s team found stark variations in the oxygen and hafnium in zircons, consistent with the continents losing an average of 2 to 3 vertical miles of rock. “We are talking about an absolutely huge amount of crust being eroded,” he said. “In which case, we should have noticed it missing — and we have.” (emphasis added)
The story’s headline notes a leading theory for this erosion being repeated eras of glaciation — “snowball earth” — but the story also notes the theory may not explain the rate of erosion. Here’s another idea:
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month—on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights… The waters flooded the earth for a hundred and fifty days. (Genesis 7:6-10, 24; emphasis added)
The Flood was more than just torrential rain. The “springs of the great deep” imply massive tectonic upheaval — just the sort of thing to produce the enormous recycling of crust described in the linked article above. There’s no question these combined effects could account for the erosion and “Great Unconformity,” because Scripture also tells us:
Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.” But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly. (2 Peter 3:3-7; emphasis added)
There IS a ‘great unconformity’ between the world that is, and the world that was. There is an even greater unconformity between the world that is, and the world that is to come. The present world is filled with evidence of the Creator and the truth of His Word — for those who “have ears to hear.”
No matter what credentials are attached to one’s name, there is no excuse for denials. Sadly, that won’t prevent many of today’s most brilliant scientific minds from reflexively ruling out any chance that Scripture has something to tell them.