A few notes to hopefully provoke your thinking today:
I’ve thought for some time that our nation’s enemies use our desire for civility and decorum to handicap us in the culture war. When the other side says “have you no decency,” it’s usually a dodge to avoid being accountable for their own actions. It seems I’m not alone in thinking so:
…while appropriate restraint is always a part of this consideration, we go too far when we decide that we must always adhere to every aspect of a dying civility no matter the cost. Failing to openly defy the Left’s blatant aggression does not preserve civility — it only emboldens the uncivil and betrays their victims.
…civility is not a moral absolute and its form is always adjusting along with culture, it’s requirements are determined primarily by social contract — the kind of behavior we all implicitly or explicitly agree to when interacting with one another. …when one party violates a contract, the other party is no longer bound by all of its terms. If you sign a contract to buy a car, and the dealer refuses to turn it over you, you aren’t “sinking to their level” by refusing to hand over your money. If you contract an employee who never shows up for work, you aren’t “repaying evil for evil” by withholding his wages. The same is true when dealing with people who are deliberately uncivil to civil people — it fundamentally changes what the rest of society owes them.
We need to stop taking the lazy road of “be civil though the heavens fall” and begin being deliberate about when to be civil — and when not to be. For starters, I suggest the following guidelines… (read the whole post here)
One of the biggest areas in which ‘civility’ and emotional blackmail is used against us is in the area of immigration. So it’s nice to see the rest of the world COMBINED recently took in more refugees than the U.S. for the first time in 38 years. Keep that little factoid handy for the next time your Leftist acquaintance decries the supposed ‘heartlessness’ of the U.S.
Leftists also demand expensive judicial proceedings for everyone who shows up on our borderlands, in order to accord them “due process rights.” Turns out the Supreme Court has ruled consistently since the late 1800s that non-citizens are not entitled automatically to the same expensive access to our judicial system that citizens have. Another handy note to have in countering our enemies’ talking points (and yes, I’m calling them enemies now. Their actions show it’s an accurate term, whether using it is civil or not).
One reason the media are held in such contempt today is the realization they, too, have broken the social contract. Presenting slanted information while claiming to be impartial is hardly being ‘civil.’ Yet the Associated Press seems to have done it again, trying to tug heartstrings by claiming the military is ‘discharging’ immigrants rather than allowing them to become citizens. But it turns out there is more to this than the AP would have you know, including the fact that ‘discharge’ is not the appropriate word for someone who hasn’t even been to Basic Training yet. But remember, kids, “fake news” is only a Trump laugh line…
Finally, for those of us who aren’t tired of winning yet, the economy is strengthening to the point labor is becoming in short supply — and hence, more valuable and lucrative. Could it be that allowing thousands of people to flow into our nation unchecked each month helped depress wages for decades? Inquiring minds should want to know…