Given that a large portion of the ‘migrant caravan’ crashing against our southern border is from Honduras, it might be useful to hear from someone familiar with conditions in that country:
I am not involved in politics but would like to present to you a new perspective in regards to the current immigration crisis based on our daily life and experiences on the northern coast of Honduras. I speak fluent Spanish and live alongside Hondurans every day in the workplace, in the local community and in the most intimate corners of my own home. Although I will never be able to change the color of my skin or re-write my cultural history, I do know and love the Honduran people and have lived in this culture my entire adult life…
Some are indeed refugees seeking legitimate asylum. But others are simply fleeing generally difficult (but not dire) conditions, or have simply chosen what seems to be the easier route of escape. It is not impossible to forge a humble living in Honduras (over 9 million Hondurans survive in this culture every day), although it is true that much corruption, lack of opportunities and violence abound…
We who are on the frontlines in Honduras have offered high-quality free education and character formation in the Living Waters Ranch school we operate out of our rural homestead to over 100 at-risk Honduran youth in the past five years. More than half have walked out because they admittedly had no interest in studying or preparing for the future. This type of apathetic attitude is common among youth in our area…
Honduras is in desperate need of reform and an effective judicial system as it is overwhelmingly true that injustice and violence reign. But that does not mean that the solution is for Hondurans to flee the country illegally…
If the United States accepts the several thousand immigrants in the caravan, there are still over 9 million Hondurans living in what those who have fled claim to be unbearable circumstances on Honduran soil. What good can be brought about by extending help to a very small percentage who present themselves as refugees unless wide-scale change will be brought about by and for the masses who have stayed behind?
The natural bent of human beings is to travel the path of least resistance. That’s why upholding standards is important — to incentivize desired outcomes and deter undesirable ones. Right now our squishy enforcement of immigration law means that for many, trying to jump the fence in Tijuana is far easier than organizing to try to improve conditions at home. A major problem is that this wave of invaders is bringing with it the very cultural patterns that facilitate those conditions in the country they left, such as a lack of planning for the future, a disregard for law and order and a willingness to step on others to achieve what one has not earned on their own.
None of that is to say that individual Hondurans are somehow subhuman or unworthy of a better life. (For the record, my wife and I sponsored three children in Honduras for about a dozen years through Compassion International). The problem here is collective culture. The roots of Latin American culture are inarguably different from those that resulted in the formation of the United States. Indeed, the cultural path from which the United States descended is different from just about every other part of the world, save certain portions of Europe (which, tragically, are even farther along in the process of abandoning it). We are justified in saying to those sneaking in for the benefits that, in the words of a former President, “you didn’t build that.” They don’t sustain it, either.
Politics, it is said, is downstream from culture. That’s why the emphasis on multiculturalism in the U.S. over the past half century has been so destructive: it is eroding the foundation upon which our social norms and system of governance rest. We have been inundated with new arrivals who do not understand why our nation has been so successful, and have little to no desire to learn. They just want the U.S. to subsidize a lifestyle their own cultures couldn’t produce. Trouble is, as more such people arrive, it is transforming our own culture in such a way we may not be so successful for much longer.
Being a compassionate nation is praiseworthy. But there is no compassion in taking away the birthright of one to hand it to another. Those who profess sympathy for the plight of Hondurans have other options available to them. The author of the linked piece is far from being the only American to forego the comforts of home to invest their life with another people. Missionaries have done so for decades — centuries, even. The difference is that in the past a consciously Christian West was sending them out and sustaining them to bring to others the light of Christ, from Whom all other lasting blessings flow.
Now, however, the “bleeding hearts” follow their own path of least resistance: “it’s easier to help by just letting in anyone who wants to come.” That attitude is indicative of the same short-sightedness and willingness to step on the rights of others that hobbles many other countries around the world. It is treating the symptoms, not the problems. For many, it’s also a cynical move to “elect a new people” more amenable to their political agenda.
Everyone has the right to take personal action to help another. No one has the right to subsume an entire country in aliens just to feed their self-esteem or lust for power.